Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpo7ftsN/PALINDROME_nokinds

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → ISPAL(P)
ISPAL(ok(X)) → ISPAL(X)
PROPER(isQid(X)) → ISQID(proper(X))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → AND(isList(V1), isNeList(V2))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → AND(isNeList(V1), isList(V2))
PROPER(isNePal(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(isQid(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → ISNELIST(V1)
PROPER(__(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ISNEPAL(ok(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ISNELIST(ok(X)) → ISNELIST(X)
ACTIVE(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → ISQID(I)
PROPER(isList(X)) → PROPER(X)
__¹(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)
__¹(mark(X1), X2) → __¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(__(X1, X2)) → __¹(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(isNeList(V)) → ISQID(V)
PROPER(isPal(X)) → PROPER(X)
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(__(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(isPal(X)) → ISPAL(proper(X))
PROPER(__(X1, X2)) → __¹(proper(X1), proper(X2))
ACTIVE(isList(__(V1, V2))) → AND(isList(V1), isList(V2))
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → AND(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → ISNELIST(V2)
AND(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(isList(__(V1, V2))) → ISLIST(V2)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → AND(proper(X1), proper(X2))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → ISLIST(V2)
ACTIVE(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(isList(__(V1, V2))) → ISLIST(V1)
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
ACTIVE(isList(V)) → ISNELIST(V)
PROPER(isNePal(X)) → ISNEPAL(proper(X))
PROPER(isNeList(X)) → PROPER(X)
ISLIST(ok(X)) → ISLIST(X)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → __¹(X, __(Y, Z))
ISQID(ok(X)) → ISQID(X)
__¹(X1, mark(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → ISQID(V)
ACTIVE(isPal(V)) → ISNEPAL(V)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → __¹(Y, Z)
PROPER(isNeList(X)) → ISNELIST(proper(X))
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → AND(isQid(I), isPal(P))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → ISLIST(V1)
PROPER(isList(X)) → ISLIST(proper(X))
ACTIVE(__(X1, X2)) → __¹(X1, active(X2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → ISPAL(P)
ISPAL(ok(X)) → ISPAL(X)
PROPER(isQid(X)) → ISQID(proper(X))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → AND(isList(V1), isNeList(V2))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → AND(isNeList(V1), isList(V2))
PROPER(isNePal(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(isQid(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → ISNELIST(V1)
PROPER(__(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ISNEPAL(ok(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ISNELIST(ok(X)) → ISNELIST(X)
ACTIVE(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → ISQID(I)
PROPER(isList(X)) → PROPER(X)
__¹(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)
__¹(mark(X1), X2) → __¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(__(X1, X2)) → __¹(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(isNeList(V)) → ISQID(V)
PROPER(isPal(X)) → PROPER(X)
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(__(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(isPal(X)) → ISPAL(proper(X))
PROPER(__(X1, X2)) → __¹(proper(X1), proper(X2))
ACTIVE(isList(__(V1, V2))) → AND(isList(V1), isList(V2))
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → AND(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → ISNELIST(V2)
AND(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(isList(__(V1, V2))) → ISLIST(V2)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → AND(proper(X1), proper(X2))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → ISLIST(V2)
ACTIVE(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(isList(__(V1, V2))) → ISLIST(V1)
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
ACTIVE(isList(V)) → ISNELIST(V)
PROPER(isNePal(X)) → ISNEPAL(proper(X))
PROPER(isNeList(X)) → PROPER(X)
ISLIST(ok(X)) → ISLIST(X)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → __¹(X, __(Y, Z))
ISQID(ok(X)) → ISQID(X)
__¹(X1, mark(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → ISQID(V)
ACTIVE(isPal(V)) → ISNEPAL(V)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → __¹(Y, Z)
PROPER(isNeList(X)) → ISNELIST(proper(X))
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → AND(isQid(I), isPal(P))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → ISLIST(V1)
PROPER(isList(X)) → ISLIST(proper(X))
ACTIVE(__(X1, X2)) → __¹(X1, active(X2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 10 SCCs with 30 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISPAL(ok(X)) → ISPAL(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISPAL(ok(X)) → ISPAL(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(ISPAL(x₁)) = (1/4)x_1
POL(ok(x₁)) = 1/4 + (2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNEPAL(ok(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISNEPAL(ok(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(ok(x₁)) = 1/4 + (2)x_1
POL(ISNEPAL(x₁)) = (1/4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISQID(ok(X)) → ISQID(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISQID(ok(X)) → ISQID(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(ISQID(x₁)) = (1/4)x_1
POL(ok(x₁)) = 1/4 + (2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNELIST(ok(X)) → ISNELIST(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISNELIST(ok(X)) → ISNELIST(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(ISNELIST(x₁)) = (1/4)x_1
POL(ok(x₁)) = 1/4 + (2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISLIST(ok(X)) → ISLIST(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISLIST(ok(X)) → ISLIST(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(ok(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(ISLIST(x₁)) = (2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

AND(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(AND(x₁, x₂)) = (1/4)x_2
POL(mark(x₁)) = 0
POL(ok(x₁)) = 1/4 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(AND(x₁, x₂)) = (1/4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1/4 + (2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

__¹(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)
__¹(X1, mark(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)
__¹(mark(X1), X2) → __¹(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

__¹(mark(X1), X2) → __¹(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

__¹(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)
__¹(X1, mark(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(__¹(x₁, x₂)) = (1/4)x_1
POL(ok(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 2 + (2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/2.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

__¹(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)
__¹(X1, mark(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

__¹(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

__¹(X1, mark(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(__¹(x₁, x₂)) = (1/2)x_1
POL(ok(x₁)) = 1/4 + (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 0

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

__¹(X1, mark(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

__¹(X1, mark(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(__¹(x₁, x₂)) = (1/4)x_2
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1/4 + (2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(isPal(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(isNePal(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(isQid(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(isNeList(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(__(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(isList(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(__(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(isPal(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(isNePal(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(isQid(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(isNeList(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(__(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(__(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

PROPER(isList(X)) → PROPER(X)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(PROPER(x₁)) = (2)x_1
POL(isPal(x₁)) = 2 + (4)x_1
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 4 + (4)x_1 + (2)x_2
POL(isList(x₁)) = x_1
POL(isNeList(x₁)) = 1 + (2)x_1
POL(isNePal(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 1/2 + x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(isQid(x₁)) = 4 + (2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(isList(X)) → PROPER(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PROPER(isList(X)) → PROPER(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(PROPER(x₁)) = (2)x_1
POL(isList(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = (2)x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 4 + x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = (2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 1/4 + (2)x_1 + (2)x_2
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = (1/4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(i) = 4
POL(a) = 2
POL(isList(x₁)) = 1/2 + (1/4)x_1
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 4 + (4)x_1 + x_2
POL(e) = 4
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1/4 + x_1
POL(ok(x₁)) = x_1
POL(isNePal(x₁)) = 1/2 + (1/4)x_1
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x_1 + x_2
POL(o) = 4
POL(isQid(x₁)) = (1/4)x_1
POL(active(x₁)) = x_1
POL(isPal(x₁)) = 1 + x_1
POL(tt) = 1/4
POL(u) = 4
POL(isNeList(x₁)) = 1/4 + (1/4)x_1
POL(TOP(x₁)) = (1/4)x_1
POL(proper(x₁)) = x_1
POL(nil) = 0

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(u) → ok(u)
proper(o) → ok(o)
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(e) → ok(e)
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(i) = 0
POL(a) = 0
POL(isList(x₁)) = 0
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = (2)x_2
POL(e) = 0
POL(ok(x₁)) = 1/4 + (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 0
POL(isNePal(x₁)) = 0
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(o) = 0
POL(isQid(x₁)) = 0
POL(active(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(isPal(x₁)) = 0
POL(tt) = 0
POL(u) = 0
POL(isNeList(x₁)) = 0
POL(TOP(x₁)) = (1/2)x_1
POL(nil) = 0

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ PisEmptyProof

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(active(X1), X2)
active(__(X1, X2)) → __(X1, active(X2))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
__(mark(X1), X2) → mark(__(X1, X2))
__(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(__(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
proper(__(X1, X2)) → __(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(isList(X)) → isList(proper(X))
proper(isNeList(X)) → isNeList(proper(X))
proper(isQid(X)) → isQid(proper(X))
proper(isNePal(X)) → isNePal(proper(X))
proper(isPal(X)) → isPal(proper(X))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(e) → ok(e)
proper(i) → ok(i)
proper(o) → ok(o)
proper(u) → ok(u)
__(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(__(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
isList(ok(X)) → ok(isList(X))
isNeList(ok(X)) → ok(isNeList(X))
isQid(ok(X)) → ok(isQid(X))
isNePal(ok(X)) → ok(isNePal(X))
isPal(ok(X)) → ok(isPal(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.